IIQE Paper 2 difficulty

Practice accuracy
71%
Difficulty rank
3/5
Answers analysed
25,157
Questions covered
666

PEAK publishes no official pass rate for IIQE Paper 2, so difficulty here is measured rather than quoted: 25,157 real answers from 251 devices give a practice accuracy of 71% — 3th hardest of 5.

Topics ranked by how often candidates get them wrong

TopicAccuracyAnswers
保險產品weakest
69.9%
13,242
核保及保單措詞
70.3%
6,648
理賠
72.2%
2,859
客戶服務
77.5%
2,408
Practice accuracy is not an exam pass rate — practice allows repeat attempts and shows explanations. Use the ordering of topics to decide where to spend revision time. Topic names follow the Chinese chapter labels used in our question banks; the examinations themselves are bilingual.

Continue with IIQE Paper 2

Try an original pro rata average question →

  1. Choose one weak topic. Explain the rule and why the other options do not fit before doing more questions. Review the matching chapter →
  2. In the IIQE Paper 2 app, practise that topic and read each explanation. Mark questions you guessed, too.
  3. Return to your mistakes without looking at the answers, then mix topics under a time limit when you can explain the reasoning.

Download free to try. Pro content, access period and price are shown in the app store screen. Website practice and app records are saved separately.

Practise IIQE Paper 2 where this data comes from

666 questions with bilingual wording, per-question explanations, topic practice and error review.

FAQ

What is the pass rate for IIQE Paper 2?
PEAK does not publish a pass rate for this paper, so no official figure exists. From our own data, practice accuracy is 71% across 25,157 answers — 3th hardest of 5.
Which topic is hardest in IIQE Paper 2?
“保險產品” at 69.9% accuracy (13,242 answers). The strongest is “客戶服務” at 77.5%.

Other papers

← All papers ranked by difficulty

Practice accuracy is measured from our own apps and is not an examination pass rate. PEAK does not publish official IIQE or MPFE pass rates.

Need other learning tools? We recommend: